Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 So. 2d 887 - Conner v. Conner

439 So. 2d 887 - Conner v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer (1986), 464 So. 2d 538 - Walter v. Walter (1985)

75 state decisions

6801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 411 So. 2d 899 - Conner v. Conner · International Funding Corp. v. Decora Steel City, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The determination that a party has been "short-changed" is an issue of fact and not one of law, and in making that determination on the facts before it in the instant case, the district court exceeded the scope of appellate review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 550 So. 2d 1125 - Berry v. Berry · 450 So. 2d 284 - McSwigan v. McSwigan
  2. “... for a further finding of fact as to what special equity, if any, the ex-wife has in property titled in the ex-husband’s name as a result of her contributions to his business and political success.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 464 So. 2d 1314 - Conner v. Conner
  3. “that the reasonableness of attorney's fees is ... an issue of fact, to be determined by the trial court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Maass v. Christensen

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.