Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 U.S. 128 - Rakas v. Illinois

Rakas v. Illinois’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

11,459
cited by 11,459 later decisions
122
cited 122 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
June 2026
most recently cited

3,188 federal appellate · 792 district · 5,115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11,459 later decisions (122 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2026 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), United States v. Leon (1984)

3,188 federal appellate · 792 district · 5,115 state decisions — followed in 49 states

4.0k0197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Warth v. Seldin

Cited together with Katz v. United States · United States v. Salvucci · Jones v. United States · Rawlings v. Kentucky · Terry v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11,459 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person's premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.”
    654 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Fourth Amendment rights are personal rights which ... may not be vicariously asserted.”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “too broad a gauge for measurement of Fourth Amendment rights.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.