Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 U.S. 1360 - BUCHANAN Et Al. v. EVANS Et Al.

BUCHANAN Et Al. v. EVANS Et Al.’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1993
most recently cited

3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1993

3 district · 2 state decisions

60197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Keyes v. School District No 1 Denver Colorado · Milliken v. Bradley · Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if this Court were permitted to consider the State Board’s proposal, the result in this case would be no different. I find the proposal unacceptable as an equitable remedy for the constitutional violations found by the three-judge court. The most obvious and significant flaw is that the proposal places the entire burden of the remedy on those whose rights have been violated. In formulating a remedy for constitutional violations, this Court must exercise its equitable powers. One would find it difficult to create a more graphic paradigm of an inequitable remedy than one which assigns to those who have been wronged the responsibility of correcting those wrongs. The uncontroverted testimony from State Board of Education personnel adduced at the hearings established that: no white student, suburban or city, would be assigned to a different school district, but every black student in Wilmington would be reassigned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whatever progress toward desegregation has been made apparently, and unfortunately, derives only from judicial action....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this dual school system has been perpetuated through constitutional violations of an interdistrict nature”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.