Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 U.S. 282 - Michigan v. Doran

Michigan v. Doran’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

1,113
cited by 1,113 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
42
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

113 federal appellate · 21 district · 867 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,113 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017 · most notably Cuyler v. Adams (1981), Alabama v. Battles (1981)

113 federal appellate · 21 district · 867 state decisions — followed in 42 states

588019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Beck v. State of Ohio · Gerstein v. Pugh · Ker v. State of California · Patterson v. United States

Cited together with California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty. · Cuyler v. Adams · Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police · Puerto Rico v. Branstad · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) whether the extradition documents on their face are in order; (b) whether the petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state; (c) whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition; and (d) whether the petitioner is a fugitive.”
    121 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.”
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a summary and mandatory executive proceeding.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.