Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ala. App. 157 - Thomas v. Ware

44 Ala. App. 157 - Thomas v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
August 1992
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 1992 · most notably 358 So. 2d 782 - Van Antwerp v. State (1978), Harnage v. State (1972)

68 state decisions

4001967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cobb v. Malone · Clark v. Hudson · Lester v. Jacobs · Wagnon v. Patterson · HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. Newton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he entry should be only a last resort, as in cases of otherwise ineradicable prejudice.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We expressly hold that a motion for mistrial — -which implies a miscarriage of justice if the trial goes on — does not include either a motion to strike out or exclude testimony as a lesser prayer for relief.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.