Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 ALAAPP 335 - Curtis v. State

Curtis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. · Booker v. State · Persons v. Summers · Penry v. Dozier · 32 Ala. App. 556 - Ray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was no proof of the value of the property. Under the statute the offender must be punished as if he had stolen it. Proof of value was, therefore, necessary to a conviction, in order to determine whether the punishment should be that prescribed for petit larceny or grand larceny.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.