Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 Ala. App. 359

Miller v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1968

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1968-03-19

Relies on Ex Parte Loyd · Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Johnson · State v. Griffin

Decided 1968-03-19

CATES, Judge.

¶1This appeal purports to come from a judgment of conviction in the Criminal Division of the Limestone County Court. Agreeably with Code 1940, T. 7, § 767, the clerk of that court has certified “a complete record of the proceedings.”

¶2The State has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record fails to contain a final judgment.

¶3On the fifth unnumbered sheet of the transcript of the record, there is set forth a chronological set of directions by the trial judge to the clerk for the making up of minute entries of the progress of the cause. This sheet, by definition, is an informal “docket” called the judge’s bench notes.1 State v. Griffin, 281 Ala. 227, 201 So.2d 100. Listed under the date of May 23, 1967, is the expression, “Jury and verdict of guilty and fine of $100.00.”

¶4The Limestone County Court is a court of record. § 1, Act No. 199, Local Acts 1947, page 113. Section S of that act provides that the practice and procedure in said court shall conform in all respects to that prevailing in the circuit court.

¶5From aught that appears, the defendant stands as though he had never been finally adjudged guilty and sentenced. Without a valid judgment of conviction, there can be no appeal. Ex parte Loyd, 275 Ala. 416, 155 So.2d 519; Moss v. State, 140 Ala. 199, 37 So. 156; Perry v. State, 4 Ala.App. 70, 59 So. 230.

¶6Motion granted; appeal dismissed.

¶7. Compare “bench docket” in Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. R.y. Co. v. Johnson, 49 Ind.App. 126, 93 N.E. 683, 95 N.E. 610.

/44/alaapp/359 · .json · Public domain