Mueller v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
1 district · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 1978 · most notably 64 Cal. 2d 778 - See v. See (1966), Nunes v. Nunes (1964)
1 district · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. 2d 858 - De Burgh v. De Burgh · Burch v. Burch · Phillips v. Phillips · Graves v. Graves · MacDonald v. MacDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When each of the parties has given the other grounds for divorce, the court may grant a divorce to both, and it 'is clothed with a broad discretion to advance the requirements of justice in each particular case.' [5, 6] The comparative guilt of the parties 'may have an important bearing upon whether or not either one or both should be granted relief,' and when 'a divorce is granted to both, alimony may be awarded to either, for the basis of liability for alimony is the granting of a divorce against the person required to pay it. (See Civ. Code, 139.)' (De Burgh v. De Burgh, supra, 39 Cal.2d 858, 872-874 . ...)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is only one factor in determining whether alimony should be awarded and that the needs of the life and the ability of the husband to provide for her are also important,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any particular case adultery may or may not constitute greater fault than that of the other party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.