Crowe v. Sacks’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably 66 Cal. 2d 821 - Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co. (1967), 44 Cal. 2d 839 - Lynch v. Birdwell (1955)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. Melody Lane · Stein v. United R.R. of S.F. · Prager v. Isreal · 10 Cal. 2d 519 - Brown v. Regan · Dorsey v. Barba
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A verdict which goes beyond the issues ... as stated in the [jury] instructions... is not in conformity with the instructions and is therefore `insufficient.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which goes beyond the issues of the case as stated in the instructions on the law given by the court to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defective in form; not in the usual form or manner; contrary to custom or prescribed rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.