44 Cal. 3d 271 - In Re Nadrich’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2000 · most notably Matter of Rivkind (1990), 48 Cal. 3d 284 - In Re Demergian (1989)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on 15 Cal. 3d 878 - Segretti v. State Bar · 6 Cal. 3d 562 - In Re Higbie · Bradpiece v. State Bar · 36 Cal. 3d 116 - Chefsky v. State Bar · 8 Cal. 3d 842 - In Re Fahey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is difficult to imagine what more petitioner could have done to demonstrate the sincerity of his commitment to positive change and rehabilitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of Rivkind“A probationary term enables the State Bar and this court to carefully monitor petitioner's progress and ensure that his rehabilitation continues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“withdrew from the active practice of law prior to committing his criminal acts,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.