44 Cal. App. 4th 1760 - Soderberg v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 171 Cal. App. 4th 1004 - Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood Apartments (2009), 123 Cal. App. 4th 76 - Knapp v. Doherty (2004)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 Cal. 4th 370 - Bily v. Arthur Young & Co. · 231 Cal. App. 3d 1089 - Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · 26 Cal. App. 4th 217 - Foxborough v. Van Atta · Stotlar v. Hester · 16 Cal. App. 4th 1830 - Jackson v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile Bily involved the liability of accountants (or auditors), we see no reason why its discussion should be limited to that group of professionals”). 19 . Towers Perrin argues that the Employees’ claims fail in part because”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Paulsen v. CNF Inc.“'knew that his appraisal was for the purpose of testing the equity for a potential loan'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tindell v. Murphy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.