Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 CONNAPP 389 - Barrenechea v. Lamonica

Barrenechea v. Lamonica’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on May v. Penn TV & Furniture Co., Inc. · State v. Falcone · State v. Santangelo · State v. Grullon · Tomczuk v. Alvarez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a challenge to jury instructions, we must examine the charge in its entirety. . . . While the instructions need not be exhaustive, perfect or technically accurate, they must be correct in law, adapted to the issues and sufficient for the guidance of the jury. . . . The court is under no duty at any time to charge in the exact language requested. . . . Failure to charge precisely as proposed by a [party] is not error where the CT Page 4702 point is fairly covered in the charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The court is under no duty at any time to charge in the exact language requested. . . . Failure to charge precisely as proposed by a defendant is not error where the point is fairly covered in the charge. . . . Instructions are adequate if they give the jury a clear understanding of the issues and proper guidance in determining those issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.