Murphy v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4 district · 15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tomlinson v. Board of Education · LaCroix v. Board of Education · Simko v. Ervin · Cannata v. Department of Environmental Protection · Payne v. Fairfield Hills Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An administrative remedy is adequate when it provides the plaintiff with the relief that she seeks and a mechanism for judicial review of the administrative decision. Cannata v. Dept. of Environmental Protection, 215 Conn. 616 , 629 , 577 A.2d 1017 (1990).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Insofar as the plaintiff may have attempted to raise a constitutional claim of deprivation of a property interest without due process, we conclude that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. See School Administrators Assn. v. Dow, 200 Conn. 376, 385 , 511 A.2d 1012 (1986). The mere allegation of a constitutional violation will not excuse a party's failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Payne v. Fairfield Hills Hospital, 215 Conn. 675, 680 , 578 A.2d 1025 (1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Here, the plaintiff failed to pursue a statutory remedy. She failed to seek a hearing before the board, thereby depriving it of the opportunity to review a matter within its province, and to prepare a proper record, if necessary, on which to seek judicial review. . . . Because of the plaintiff's failure to comply with the general rule of exhaustion of administrative remedies before pursuing her action in the Superior Court, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.