Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 DEL 251 - State v. Long

State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1983

2 state decisions

3019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Zichfeld · Ainscow v. Alexander · State v. Armington · Squire v. State · 17 Cal. App. 171 - People v. Priestley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find the overwhelming weight of authority to be that in a prosecution for bigamy, under enactments containing exceptions in favor of persons who have been lawfully divorced, a bona fide belief that a legal divorce has been granted affords the accused no defense, the reason being that the Legislature having fixed the exceptions the Courts cannot extend them to persons who have not been, but who in good faith believed they have been, lawfully divorced. Further, if the pretended decree of divorce upon which the person relies is in fact illegal and void because made by a Court having no jurisdiction, it affords no protection against the consequences of a second marriage whatever may have been the defendant's motive or his belief in respect to the validity of the decree, since his mistake or *Page 214 ignorance, if any, was one of law and not of fact. His case is one to which the maxim `ignoranti juris non excusat' applies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.