Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.1d 94 - Crossan v. Wood

Crossan v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis

44 F. 94 · 1890

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1952
most recently cited

3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1952

3 district ·

101890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Havemeyer · Smith v. Havemeyer · Manhattan Transp. Co. v. Mayor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The primary fact of the existence of the obstructions alleged, and that the damage arose from that cause,” must be clearly proved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.