Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 F.2d 70

Docket No. 30460.

In re Cochran

Washington Western District Court

Decided April 17, 1930.

Washington Western District Court · decided 1930-04-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Cochran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-04-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1986

7 federal appellate ·

70193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See, also, 40 F.(2d) 282.

¶2George S. Cochran and the marital community composed of George S. Cochran and Evelyn O. Cochran, his wife, were adjudged bankrupt on the petition of George S. Cochran. Thereafter the trustee filed a petition alleging that the bankrupts, as a community and individually, had in their possession $150,000 cash belonging to the estate in bankruptcy, and were concealing the same from the trustee, and praying that an order be issued directing the bankrupts, as a community and individually, to turn over and deliver to the trustee the said sum of $150,000.

¶3The show cause order was served upon Evelyn O. Cochran in the city of Minneapolis, state of Minnesota. To the order she entered a special appearance and challenged the jurisdiction of the court to effectuate any order against the said Evelyn O. Cochran, and moved to quash the service of the show cause order; and also, specially appearing, challenged and demurred to the jurisdiction of the court in the said show cause order matter.

¶4The record shows that Evelyn O. Cochran was, and is, a resident of the city of Minneapolis, state of Minnesota, and was not within the jurisdiction of this court at any of the time in issue.

¶5The referee thereafter sustained the demurrer and challenge to the jurisdiction to entertain summary proceedings against Evelyn O. Cochran. The trustee, feeling aggrieved, has brought the matter into this court for review.

¶6Leopold M. Stern, of Seattle, Wash., for trustee.

¶7S. J. Wettrick, of Seattle, Wash., for Evelyn O. Cochran.

¶8NETERER, District Judge

¶9(after stating the facts as above).

¶10The order of the referee sustaining the demurrer and challenge to the jurisdiction to entertain summary proceedings against Evelyn O. Cochran, wife of the bankrupt, is affirmed, and the petition for review is denied.

/44/f2d/70 · .json · Public domain