United States v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
44 F.3d 1364 · 1995
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Fernandez (2004)
36 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 846 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Abney v. United States · United States v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f two offenses are not the same for purposes of barring multiple punishment, they necessarily will not be the same for purposes of barring successive prosecutions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Flenoy · State v. Weaver“the two offenses charged are in law and fact the same offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.