Bradley v. Kochenash’s Empirical Analysis
44 F.3d 166 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2018
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Relies on State of Texas v. State of Florida · Hebel v. Ebersole · Bankers Trust Co. v. Manufacturers National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Persons having claims against the plaintiff may be joined as defendants and required to interplead when their claims are such that the plaintiff is or may be exposed to double or multiple liability. It is not ground for objection to the joinder that the claims of the several claimants or the titles on which their claims depend do not have a common origin or are not identical but are adverse to and independent of one another, or that the plaintiff avers that the plaintiff is not hable in whole or in part to any or all of the claimants .... (2) The remedy herein provided is in addition to and in no way supersedes or limits the remedy provided by Title 28, U.S.C. §§ 1335 ,1397 and 2361 ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), is a corporation whose predecessor was founded in 1986 by, inter alios, Bradley and plaintiffs John G. Poole and Laurence DeFrance. Bradley, Poole, and DeFrance are and, since its founding have been, among DBI's officers and directors; individually and through related entities, they have always held a majority or controlling interest in DBI. 3 Defendant DeVlieg, Inc. (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Kochenash“) for a total of approximately $36.4 million. 5 In August 1991, DeVlieg filed a petition for bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In August 1993, DeVlieg and its Committee of Unsecured Creditors commenced an action in that court, DeVlieg, Inc. v. Bradley, No. 93-C-20208 (N.D.Ill.1993) (the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradley v. Kochenash
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.