Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 218 - Spicer v. Virginia, Department of Corrections

Spicer v. Virginia, Department of Corrections’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 218 · 1995

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 1997
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Hensley v. Eckerhart · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Farrar v. Hobby · Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not require anyone to attend the training sessions, did not know who attended the sessions and did not remember much of what was taught. Id. The district court found that the EEO manager, himself, was”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this matter. Warden Smith forwarded the August 1 memorandum to the supervisors of the employees involved, together with a cover letter directing the supervisors to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “I can't believe that as tough as you are with the visitor's dress code that you would allow one of your employees to come into your institution dressed like this.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.