Hazard v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 399 · 1995

Citation profile

cited by 9 later decisions

states following

February 2006

most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 720 · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 415 (§ 215 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 702

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Pickens v. Lockheed Corp. · National Welfare Rights Organization v. Mathews · Philadelphia Citizens in Action v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“) program. AFDC is a cooperative federal-state program which provides monetary assistance to needy, dependent children. The federal government prescribes eligibility criteria for AFDC recipients and provides states with matching funds for distribution. The states administer the program according to plans approved by HHS. See 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.2 & 233.10(b)(1); 42 U.S.C. § 601. 11 In 1955, the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Gamboa v. Rubin
“the 1979 vehicle asset limitation for food stamp recipients excluded only a small percentage of individuals who otherwise would have been eligible receive food stamps.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Gamboa v. Rubin
“The Secretary responds that inflation's effect of gradually tightening eligibility standards is consistent with congressional intent in enacting OBRA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Gamboa v. Rubin

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.