Schulz’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably In Re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation, Gizella Weisshaus (2000), 262 F. Supp. 2d 134 - NAS Electronics, Inc. v. Transtech Electronics PTE Ltd. (2003)
1 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Allen v. McCurry · Allen v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he state is not required to provide such lists free of charge, but when it does so it may not provide them only for the large political parties and deny them to those parties which can least afford to purchase them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is clear that the effect of these provisions, when considered with other sections of the Election Law, is to deny independent or minority parties which have succeeded in gaining a position on the ballot but which have not polled 50,000 votes for governor in the last preceding gubernatorial election an equal opportunity to win the votes of the electorate. The State has shown no compelling state interest nor even a justifiable purpose for granting what, in effect, is a significant subsidy only to those parties which have least need therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we see no reason why the patent constitutional infirmity of section 5-602 [voter registration lists at issue in Socialist Workers Party ] would not apply to section 5-604 [party preference information].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.