Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 489 - Bae v. Shalala

Bae v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 489 · 1995

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
6
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Doe v. Poritz (1995), Doe v. Pataki (1997)

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 12 state decisions

500199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 21 U.S.C. § 335A (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 7 U.S.C. § 9

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Weaver v. Graham · United States v. Halper · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Flemming v. Nestor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A civil sanction that can fairly be said solely to serve remedial goals will not fail under ex post facto scrutiny simply because it is consistent with punitive goals as well.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he duration or severity of an employment restriction will not mark it as punishment where it is intended to further a legitimate governmental purpose.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he punitive effects of the [debarment] are merely incidental to its overriding purpose to safeguard the integrity of the generic drug industry while protecting public health”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.