Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 567 - McGrath v. Gillis

McGrath v. Gillis’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 567 · 1995

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably Snyder v. Nolen (2004), Gregorich v. Lund (1995)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

240199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “come forward with evidence that would reasonably permit the finder of fact to find in [its] favor on a material question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'sufficient consensus based on all relevant case law, indicating that the officials' conduct was unlawful’ is required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.