Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 580 - United States v. Goad

United States v. Goad’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 580 · 1995

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Irey (2010), United States of America v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara Jaime Romero-Bautista (2000)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

220199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Morris v. Slappy · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Garber v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “advised [Hoskins] about . . . the benefits associated with the right to counsel, the pitfalls of self-representation, and the fact that it is unwise for one not trained in the law to try to represent himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To revoke a defendant's supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), the district court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] term of supervised release does not replace a portion of the sentence of imprisonment but rather is an order of supervision in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed by the court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.