Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 673 - United States v. Shields

United States v. Shields’s Empirical Analysis

44 F.3d 673 · 1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably United States v. Betz (1996), United States v. Payne (1996)

24 federal appellate ·

170199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Khang · United States v. Bost · United States v. Richmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not clearly improbable that the weapon had some nexus with criminal activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hile the district court is not bound by stipulations entered into between the parties, plea bargaining is certainly a favorable way to dispose of many of the criminal cases present on the increasingly-crowded district court dockets. Meaningful plea bargaining requires a degree of trust between defendants and prosecuting bodies. Lest they desire to have trials on all criminal matters, district courts should be wary of conduct which tends to undermine the trust [defendants] place in the deals they strike with prosecutors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.