Abdullah v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
44 F.3d 692 · 1995
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Penson v. Ohio · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.