Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.3d 978 - Suramerica Aleaciones Laminadas Ca Ca Ca v. United States

Suramerica Aleaciones Laminadas Ca Ca Ca v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
January 2026
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 167 F. Supp. 2d 1353 - Altx, Inc. v. United States (2001), 33 F. Supp. 2d 1082 - Goss Graphics System, Inc. v. United States (1998)

1 district ·

3801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. United States · Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. United States · Suramerica Aleaciones Laminadas Ca Ca Ca v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contradictory evidence or evidence from which conflicting inferences could be drawn.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The substantiality of evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “this court will not ignore the informed opinion of the Court of International Trade”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.