Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 F.4th 115 - Williams v. MTA Bus Co.

Williams v. MTA Bus Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 6

Relies on Christensen v. Harris County · Capobianco v. City of New York · McBride v. BIC Consumer Products Manufacturing Co. · Loeffler v. Staten Island University Hospital · Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux North America, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.