United States v. Galiczynski’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Service by fax does not satisfy Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)). See also United States v. Galiczynski, 44 F.Supp. 2d 707, 713 (E.D. Pa. 1999) ("The result reached here, that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not authorize service by fax, is consistent with the unanimous decisions rendered by courts that have considered the issue.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Wilkens v. Johnson

2. “The rebuttable presumption of service by mailing, or in this case, by fax, can be established by pointing to circumstantial evidence, such as evidence of standard operating office procedures or business practices regularly used concerning the mailing or faxing of documents by a party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 851 So. 2d 208 - Mendelsohn v. FL. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

3. “A court may by local rule permit papers to be filed, signed, or verified by electronic means that are consistent with technical standards, if any, that the Judicial Conference of the United States establishes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Wilkens v. Johnson