Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 Ga. App. 293

Henry v. Ringle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1931

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1931-11-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1940

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-11-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Broyles, O. J.

¶1Under all the facts of the ease, including the admissions of W. T. Henry, guardian, made in open court, the judge did not err in striking said Henry’s response to the rule nisi (served upon him in a proceeding to distribute funds), upon the ground that the response showed on its face that the debt in question was one dischargeable in bankruptcy, and properly passed an order directing that the funds be paid over to Ringle, the receiver.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and BloodiuoHh, JJ., concur.Harvey H. Tisinger, Willis Smith, for plaintiff.Grant & Long, for defendant.
/44/gaapp/293 · .json · Public domain