State v. Tin Yan’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2006
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Panama Co v. Johnson · Standard Oil Company v. Edward Anderson · Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank · Krueger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the following conditions exist: (1) the statute contains an enumeration by specific words[;] (2) the members of the enumer ation constitute a class; (3) the class is not exhausted by the enumeration; (4) a general term follows the enumeration[;] and (5) there is not clearly manifested an intent that the general term be given a broader meaning than the doctrine requires.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he purpose of the rule is to give effect to both the particular and general words, by treating the particular words as indicating the class, and the general words as extending the provisions of the statute to everything embraced in that class, though not specifically named by the particular words.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“lessees of record” are general terms, however, diere is no enumeration of specific words so as to indicate any establishment of a class to which”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.