¶1Appellee brought suit to recover the stipulated compensation he would have received for some six months’ services, had he not, as he insisted, been wrongfully discharged.
¶2The declaration contains only the common counts. The action being not for work and labor performed, but for damages resulting from a breach of a special contract, no recovery could be had under the common counts. 1 Chitty’s Pleadings, 359, 360; Hulle v. Heightman, 2 East, 401; Trustees v. Shaffer, 63 Ill. 243.
¶3The defendant asked to have the jury instructed that the plaintiff must prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence; this the court refused to do. Under the issues formed, the burden being upon the plaintiff, he was required to make out his case by a preponderance of the evidence, and this instruction should have been given. Watt v. Kirby, 15 Ill. 200; Schroeder v. Walsh, 120 Ill. 403.
¶4The judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed and the cause remanded.
¶5Reversed and remanded.