Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ill. App. 3d 607 - People v. Fix

44 Ill. App. 3d 607 - People v. Fix’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2001

11 state decisions

501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · 51 Ill. 2d 103 - Bridgewater v. Hotz · City of Elmhurst v. Buettgen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where, as is the case with most retail mercantile establishments, the customer and the property available for sale are intermingled or placed in close proximity, there can be little doubt that the potential for misconduct by theft is significant and uniquely related to the nature of the business. We find nothing improper in providing a special theft statute applicable to offenses of this special nature.” Fix, 44 Ill. App. 3d 607, 610 , 358 N.E.2d 726, 728 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.