Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ill. App. 3d 977 - People v. Hanson

44 Ill. App. 3d 977 - People v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 124 Ill. App. 3d 516 - People v. Hunter (1984), Ruetz v. State (1978)

37 state decisions

260197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Roberts v. LaVallee · 24 Ill. 2d 295 - The People v. Lewerenz · 28 Ill. 2d 65 - The People v. Anthony · 16 Ill. 2d 459 - The People v. Stanton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The denial of a court reporter is neither a denial of due process nor a denial of equal protection. Although the State must afford indigent defendants an equal opportunity to appeal, the State is not required to provide a stenographer’s transcript in every case a defendant can not afford to have one made as long as there is some other means to allow for adequate and effective appellate review. (Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 100 L. Ed. 891 , 76 S. Ct. 585 (1956).) * * [I]f no verbatim transcript is available, adequate and effective appellate review is available under the procedure provided in Supreme Court Rule 323(c), (d) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 323(c), (d)), allowing for a stipulated or certified report of the proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where the court is dealing with a prosecution of an offense involving narcotics, evidence of other offenses is inadmissible except where the other offense is part of the res gestae of the offense charged or it helps to prove motive, intent, premeditation, guilty knowledge or a common plan or scheme.” (People v. Hanson (3d Dist. 1977), 44 Ill. App. 3d 977, 984 , 359 N.E.2d 188, 194 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The court shall not require as a condition of the sentence of probation or conditional discharge that the offender be committed to a period of imprisonment in excess of 3 months. Persons committed to imprisonment as a condition of probation or conditional discharge shall not be committed to the Department of Corrections.” (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1978 Supp., ch. 38, par. 1005 — 6—3(d).)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.