¶1This was a prosecution against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the act of 1873. Conviction:
¶2No question is involved in the case beyond such as were decided in the cases of Groesch v. The State, 42 Ind. 547, and Lehritter v. The State, 42 Ind. 383. For the reasons given in those cases, the judgment must be affirmed.
¶3The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.