Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 IND 331 - Lerch v. Emmett

Lerch v. Emmett’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1994

12 state decisions

301873188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Travellers' Insurance v. Leeds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When a judge is disqualified to try a case, he may, by law, call an attorney to take his place in the trial of the cause.... In such a case, the attorney, or judge pro tem., has all the power of the regular judge over or in the case.... When an attorney or judge has been called or appointed to try a case in the place of the regular judge, such called or appointed judge has the same power over the case as the regular judge would have had, if he had not been disqualified; hence, as the regular judge might have given time and signed a bill of exceptions after the term, the called or appointed judge may and ought to do so in a proper case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.