Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 Ind. App. 321

Green v. Felton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1909

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1909-10-06

From Rush Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Judge. Suit by Chester P. Pelton and others against Thomas M. Green and others. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. (For decision on merits, see 42 Ind. App. 675.) On motion to retax costs.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1952

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Motion sitstained · Decided 1909-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Motion to Retax Costs.

Per Curiam.

¶2Appellees severally move that the court retax the sum of $176.30, the same being the alleged amount paid the official stenographer of the Rush Circuit Court by appellants for the transcript of the evidence in said cause.

¶3The motion is predicated upon four causes. Prom the fourth it appears that said official stenographer had taxed in his favor in the Rush Circuit Court the sum of $176.30 for making said transcript. Appellants denied that that amount was due, and made a motion to have said costs retaxed. The *322stenographer was summoned, and the amount due to said stenographer was submitted to the Rush Circuit Court, Which rendered judgment that said stenographer should receive the sum of $100 for said transcript, and that he should refund all over that amount.

¶4The judgment of the Rush Circuit Court is binding on the parties. The clerk of this court is therefore directed to modify said item of $176.30, by retaxing the same at $100. Said motion as to other causes is overruled.

/44/indapp/321 · .json · Public domain