Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 KAN 596 - State v. Matthews

State v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025

1 district · 15 state decisions

4018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Drury v. Foster · Pence v. Arbuckle · People v. Wakely · Field v. Stagg · Wilcox v. . Howell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The filiarse of committing the offense of obtaining money or property under false pretenses cannot be maintained in any case unless it appears not only that a false pretense was in fact made, but also that it was made with the intention of cheating or defrauding some person, and that such person was in fact cheated or defrauded lo his or her injury. These are elementary principles and really require no citation of authorities. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.