Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Kan. App. 2d 1078 - State v. Moralez

44 Kan. App. 2d 1078 - State v. Moralez’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The discovery of an outstanding arrest warrant informs the law enforcement officer that a magistrate has found there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person subject to the warrant has committed the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In routine police encounters that lead to warrants checks, there is almost always no temporal break between the initial detention and the subsequent discovery of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.