44 Kan. App. 2d 268 - Rucker v. DeLAY’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. Commission · In the Matter of Jensen · Richards v. Shearer · Shepard v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance · Cosgrove v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The language here attempts to create an interest which has no leasing rights (nonparticipating) with no reservation of a right to enter and produce. The one-eighth is a traditional leasehold royalty a portion of which is attempted to be reserved forever but which may not ever come to fruition (if land is never leased or developed).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rucker v. DeLay““The grantor herein reserves 60% of the land owner s one-eighth interest to the oil, gas or other minerals that may hereafter be developed under any oil and gas lease made by the grantee or by his subsequent grantees.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rucker v. DeLay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.