44 Kan. App. 2d 373 - State v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Gracey · State v. McKay · State v. Blackmon · State v. Martin · State v. Heath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he sentencing judge shall impose the presumptive sentence provided by the sentencing guidelines for crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993, unless the judge finds substantial and compelling reasons to impose a departure. If the sentencing judge departs from the presumptive sentence, the judge shall slate on the record at the time of sentencing the substantial and compelling reasons for the departure." (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hines
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.