Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 MASSAPPCT 578 - Plummer v. Gillieson

Plummer v. Gillieson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2010

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

100199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of New Orleans v. Dukes · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · Sisson v. Ruby · Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Ladd, Register of Copyrights · Klein v. Catalano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Notwithstanding the provisions of section seven of chapter two hundred and sixty, any claim by a minor against a health care provider stemming from professional services or health care rendered, whether in contract or tort, based on an alleged act, omission or neglect shall be commenced within three years from the date the cause of action accrues, except that a minor under the full age of six years shall have until his ninth birthday in which the action may be commenced, but in no event shall any such action be commenced more than seven years after occurrence of the act or omission which is the alleged cause of the injury upon which such action is based except where the action is based upon the leaving of a foreign object in the body.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In order to counter the effect of [the Franklin] decision on the cost of malpractice insurance and its resulting effect on the cost of health care, the Legislature amended the applicable statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims for both minors and adults by adding a statute of repose . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he language of the statute is plain and unambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.