Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

44 Misc. 425

Schieck v. Donohue

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904

New York Supreme Court · decided 1904-07-15

<p>Surplus moneys.</p> <p>Where a new claim for surplus moneys is filed between the time of the application for the reference and that of the entry of the order, the claimant must, under Rule 64 of the General Rules of Practice, have notice, nunc pro 'tunc, of the application for a reference before the justice can sign the order.</p>

Decided 1904-07-15

Giegerich, J.

¶1It appearing that, since the motion for a reference to ascertain and report as to who is entitled to the *426surplus moneys was made and granted, a new claim has been filed, the proposed order cannot be signed at present. ' Rule 64 provides that all who file a notice of claim previous to the entry of the order of reference shall be entitled to notice of the application for the reference. It is obvious, however, that such notice may be given nunc fro tunc when, as here, the claim is filed intervening the application and the order. Upon proof of the giving of such notice and of notice of settlement of the order and in default of any objection from the new claimant I will sign the order submitted. ✓

¶2Ordered accordingly.

/44/misc/425 · .json · Public domain