Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1940-06-05
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1997
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
The cross-appellants state that we were in error in holding that they failed to comply with paragraph 6 of Rule 15. That while they did not quote the evidence or refer to the transcript in support of the findings, they did by reference to their original brief.
¶2This we find to be correct; and in view of which we have again reviewed the case and conclude the cross-appeal is without merit.