Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ohio App. 2d 108 - Quayle v. Varga

44 Ohio App. 2d 108 - Quayle v. Varga’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 127 Ohio St. 469 - Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co. · Wever v. Hicks · DeAmiches v. Popczun · 37 Ohio App. 2d 73 - McCormick v. Haley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) A motion for a directed verdict may be made on the opening statement of the opponent, at the close of the opponent’s evidence or at the close of all the evidence. (( * * * “(4) When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that issue.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““3. Upon motion to direct a verdict the party against whom the motion is made is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor. But if upon any essential issue, after giving the evidence such favorable construction, reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the judge should direct a verdict against him. “4. Where from the evidence reasonable minds may reach different conclusions upon any question of fact, such question of fact is for the jury. The test is not whether the trial judge would set aside a verdict on the weight of the evidence. ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.