Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ohio App. 2d 177 - State v. Butler

44 Ohio App. 2d 177 - State v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

11019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Benz · Burall v. Johnston · Stidham v. United States · Oxman v. United States · United States v. Churchill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sentence pronounced in open court, though not formalized by journal entry, may not be vacated or amended, even though the defendant has not satisfied or suffered any part of the punishment thereunder, unless the revocation or amendment is formalized by journal entry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.