44 Ohio App. 2d 256 - State v. Winbush’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2013
4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 18 Ohio St. 2d 13 - State v. Staten · State v. Jackson · 143 Ohio St. 39 - State v. McNicol
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * [A] husband has a possessory interest in the abode of his spouse and, therefore, may not be found guilty of simple trespass where no violence is involved because of his right to be there***.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may not use violence to enforce his possessory interest. In other words, one spouse may not use violence to enter the abode of the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.