Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ohio App. 3d 128 - State v. Robinson

44 Ohio App. 3d 128 - State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018

18 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Dandridge v. Williams · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rather, the phrase `commonly known as a pit bull dog' refers to those animals which display the physical characteristics generally conforming to the various standards normally associated with pit bulls.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[although the statute lacks a specific definition of pit bull dog, mathematical certainty is not always essential”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “does not refer to one particular breed, but encompasses several breeds or a cross-section thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.