Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 44 Ohio App. 3d 212 - State v. Joseph

44 Ohio App. 3d 212 - State v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2017

20 state decisions

1301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 17 Ohio App. 3d 216 - City of Garfield Heights v. Brewer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a trial court in a misdemeanor offense case accepts a plea of no contest without first informing the defendant of the effect of such plea, as mandated by Crim.R. 11(E), and there is absolutely no compliance with the Rule, the error will be considered prejudicial * * *.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Crim.R. 11(E) requires that the record affirmatively demonstrate that a plea of no contest was entered voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly. A meaningful dialogue between the court and the defendant is required whenever the possibility of incarceration exists.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘The Court: Mr. Joseph, do you understand that if you change your plea from Not Guilty to Guilty on this charge you’ll be giving up your right to have a trial? “ ‘Mr. Joseph: Yes sir. “ ‘The Court: Is that what you wish to do? “ ‘Mr. Joseph: Yes sir. “ ‘The Court: Your social security number, please, Mr. Joseph? “ ‘Mr. Joseph: Five one five, five four, eight two four four. “ ‘The Court: Would you please review this with your attorney? I’ll accept the change of plea. A finding of guilty will be entered. * * * Joseph, supra, at 213 , 542 N.E.2d at 691-692 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.