44 Ohio App. 3d 40 - In Re Thrush’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “When questions of fact are tried by the court without a jury, judgment may be general for the prevailing party unless one of the parties in writing requests otherwise before the entry of judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 58, or not later than seven days after the party filing the request has been given notice of the court's announcement of its decision, whichever is later, in which case, the court shall state in writing the conclusions of fact found separately from the conclusions of law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Williams v. Mabra, Unpublished Decision (11-6-2006)

2. “separate findings of fact and conclusions of law upon timely request. " (Emphasis added.) Id. at 41 . {¶ 39} In this case, appellant never asked the trial court to make separate findings of fact or conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. Furthermore, when a hearing was held on appellant's "objection”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Williams v. Mabra, Unpublished Decision (11-6-2006)